@cyberpunkspike, I don’t understand your question. You asked me about why there should be so many separate states. First off, America has three or four branches of government, the legislative, executive, judicial, and we the people. The fourth branch may be part of the legislative to an extent in the form of voting, protesting. But when government gets out of control, like it is in Venezuela, then the 4th must have the 4th amendment (privacy), the 1st, and especially the 2nd in bearing arms. There are different levels of government, federal, state, local. So, there is separation seen in the different branches and levels of the nation state. Balance is good.
We live in a world with different nation states, different countries. It’s almost irrelevant to ask the question about whether or not there should be so many different countries as we already have that. Would you rather have just one new world order that splits the planet into ten states of tyranny under an anti-Christ ruler that is bigger than the Pope and technocracy combined?
@cyberpunkspike, so, you said that according to my view, allegedly, that I may believe that the relationship between individuals and governments in different countries around the world is the same or similar to each other, but what does that even mean and what would be the alternative? Are there different relationships between people and their rulers just like how there are differences between children and their parents or their teachers or workers with their employers or spouses and lovers with each other? We all know there are both differences and similarities. If I emphasize on the similarities that mothers have with loving their kids, then does that mean that I think all mothers are the same? No. But emphasis is there and that is good. Similarities are there in the emphasis and that is good.
@cyberpunkspike, I love nationalism. but you lie and say I’m anti-national. You wrote, and I quote, “Your version of anarchy is just anti-nationalism.” Yeah, if your nation is infiltrated by the swamp, why wouldn’t you be against that type of deep state tyranny? I want Obama in jail. I want Hillary Clinton, George Soros, Rothschild, Bush, and others, in jail. I love nationalism but not the swamp. I love Trump but hate that Trump promoted 5G. We need to stop 5G as fiber optics are faster. We need to free Julian Assange.
@cyberpunkspike, did you say that my version of anarchy cannot even protect us from the state? I don’t know what that means specifically as that is very vague. What would be the alternative to that very vague statement that you made that appears not to have a lot specific points? I believe in making the most of what we have in America through the 3 or 4 branches of government and through free markets and through the freedoms that we have.
For example, if a bunch of people in America want to vote to ban Burning Man completely or partly, then they have the freedom in America to pursue that in creating laws, prohibition, in giving law enforcement more power or in enforcing the Californian laws that we already have more and more. I would rather not try too hard to criminalize too many drugs and too many different things but I am only one person. People in America can protest and they can run for office and they can vote and they can try their best to change things and that is what America is all about and I am here to help America stay America and Open Borders is destroying that. Soros and others are trying to destroy America and they have been. But Obama is going to be arrested. Countries do exist. They are not non-existent. I believe in countries. But I also believe in going after the swamp. I believe in constitutional, representative republics over tyrannies, plutocracy, globalism, technocracy, authoritarianism, etc, etc.
@cyberpunkspike, what is my version of self and how does my version differ from your version? What would be an alternative to what we have in America? I love America and I want to Make America Great Again (MAGA).